In April, the City of Winnipeg shared their draft recommendations for the new Pedestrian and Cycling Strategies. These plans will set the framework for major decisions over the next 20 years, including what type and quality of walking and cycling infrastructure is built, along with where and when. Didn’t make it to the Open Houses? View the presentation boards here.
Check out the following highlights from Green Action Centre’s response to the draft recommendations or read our full comments here (pdf).
Highlights from Green Action Centre’s response:
There are many items included in the draft strategies that we welcome, in particular the recognition of the important role of the Active and Safe Routes to School program (School Travel Planning) delivered by Green Action Centre, and other specific items such as the sidewalk infill and improvement program, development of a winter cycling network, requiring large events to provide bicycle parking, and developing a separate sidewalk snow clearing priority system.
However, we believe the Pedestrian and Cycling Strategies require a stronger foundation to underpin the recommended actions.
The most critical items are to:
1) State a clear commitment to prioritizing walking and cycling in Winnipeg.
The language used and recommendations presented in the draft strategies continue to perpetuate the status quo in Winnipeg that walking and cycling will be “accommodated” as long as it does not impinge on motorists.
A clear commitment to making walking and cycling a priority will help provide the necessary support for administration and elected officials to make and defend decisions such as the removal of parking and reduced vehicle lanes or lane widths. Meeting demand for cycling and walking with the quality infrastructure that Winnipeggers will find comfortable and safe, such as protected bike lanes and separated facilities, requires a strong and clear commitment from the City.
2) Add a seventh step to the Strategic Framework: Evaluation.
Measurable targets need to be set and tracked to help evaluate progress and effectiveness of the measures implemented. It is essential to know if the approaches taken actually result in an increase in the number of Winnipeggers walking and cycling.
Evaluating Multi-Modal Level of Service is critical when selecting among possible road treatments for new facilities or prioritizing where retrofits are required. While the development of LOS for pedestrians and cyclists is a burgeoning field, there is significant progress being made. For reference, please see Boston’s Complete Streets Guidelines.
3) Create a network map based on significant public input at the neighbourhood level.
The network map presented at the Open House was too small and too general for us to be able to offer comments on specific routes selected. It was also not clear when or who had provided input into this network map. We would recommend a meaningful public consultation effort such as the Bike, Walk, Roll Fort Richmond process, which engaged the broader community, including schools, to create a neighbourhood walking and cycling map. This is a critical component of fleshing out the AT network map in Winnipeg, since the past and proposed versions focus on a spoke and hub approach that does not address cross-town trips.
What was painfully apparent on the network map shown at the Open House was the small number of protected bike lanes (cycle tracks) that are planned and the continued exclusion of major thoroughfares, such as Portage Avenue, Main St., Osborne St. through the Village, that connect with major destinations, shopping and employment. (On this note, we highly commend the City for the parking protected bike lane planned for Sherbrook St.)
It is now recognized in North America that protected bike lanes are a key facility type that successfully draws out more residents to feel safe to cycle (see related article). Notably, they enable much broader participation, including more women and people with children. For this reason, we believe there should be more emphasis on neighbourhood greenways (bike boulevards) for adjacent, quieter streets and protected bike lanes (cycle tracks) on major roads. For reference, please see Seattle’s revised bicycle master plan and this related article.
4) Include sufficient staffing to implement the strategies.
No matter the quality of the strategies, it will be meaningless without sufficient staff allocated, particularly within Public Works, to implement the recommendations.
Other recommendations to strengthen the strategy are to:
- Include traffic calming and reduced speed limits as specific measures to increase safety and improve the walking and cycling environment.
- Address the role and impact of major projects such as the redevelopment of the Southwood Lands at the University of Manitoba and the area surrounding Polo Park Shopping Centre.
- Strengthen integration of the strategies with transit and carsharing (Peg City Car Co-op) for a multi-modal network. For reference, consider the Canadian Urban Transit Association’s Task Force on Integrated Mobility.
- Include community-based travel marketing in the Marketing and Communication plans. Travel marketing has clearly demonstrated success both in Winnipeg and other cities in converting drive alone trips to walking, cycling and transit, as well as increasing uptake of new infrastructure. For reference, see Winnipeg’s pilot project on Community-Based Travel Marketing.
- Complete the design guidelines, which have been underway at the City for several years. These guidelines are an essential component of the strategies and are clearly necessary to help choose treatments and avoid situations such as the current two-year closure of the Assiniboine Ave protected bike lane (cycle track). For reference, we would point to the NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide for best practices.
Overall, the price tag of $334 million to implement all aspects of both strategies seems very reasonable compared with the cost of major road projects (Disraeli Bridge & Overpass $195 million; Chief Peguis Extension to Route 90 $240 million).
A cost/benefit analysis of the $334 million on walking and cycling, which would benefit all Winnipeg residents and neighbourhoods, would be helpful to identify the savings from reduced motorized vehicle traffic, reduced wear and tear on infrastructure, improved health and quality of life, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and improved ability to attract and retain young people.
I strongly commend your organisation for the work being done relative to this topic, in particular the non-partisan tone in which issues and topics are presented . Not antagonizing the vast majority of Winnipeg residents who don’t cycle commute is critical I feel to any eventual infrastructure plan. As a very longtime resident of Winnipeg and a cyclist however I have sadly seen the ease of access and safety of riding in combination with street traffic significantly decline since the 70’s when I was riding most actively in the urban setting. As a longtime employee of Sport Chek in Winnipeg as well I have had a unique vantage point from which to see this dialogue play out through conversations with our customers. Anything that I can do to help promote your message through our stores I would be happy to do.
Thanks, Glenn, and great to hear. We will definitely follow up with you to see how we can help share information through Sport Chek’s stores.